Notes on Measurement Theory for Causal-Formative Indicators: A Reply to Hardin
- Author(s)
- Kenneth A. Bollen, Adamantios Diamantopoulos
- Abstract
The current article is a rejoinder to “A Call for Theory to Support the Use of Causal-Formative Indicators: A Commentary on Bollen and Diamantopoulos.” Our article comments on the 6 research questions raised by Hardin (2017) in his constructive commentary on our original article (i.e., “In Defense of Causal-Formative Indicators: A Minority Report”).
- Organisation(s)
- Department of Accounting, Innovation and Strategy
- External organisation(s)
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- Journal
- Psychological Methods
- Volume
- 22
- Pages
- 605-608
- No. of pages
- 4
- ISSN
- 1082-989X
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000149
- Publication date
- 2017
- Peer reviewed
- Yes
- Austrian Fields of Science 2012
- 502052 Business administration
- Keywords
- ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Psychology (miscellaneous)
- Portal url
- https://ucris.univie.ac.at/portal/en/publications/notes-on-measurement-theory-for-causalformative-indicators-a-reply-to-hardin(f8a4348a-5235-435b-8e4c-1323cbea54d7).html