'Good' case research in industrial marketing

Author(s)
Rebecca Piekkari, Emmanuella Plakoyiannaki, Catherine Welch
Abstract

The purpose of this article is to contribute to the emerging debate about the use of the case methodology in industrial marketing. We conducted a content analysis of the 145 case studies published in three key journals (Industrial Marketing Management, Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing and Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing) over a 10-year period (1997-2006). The findings highlight the dominance of case research in qualitative industrial marketing research. They also lead us to distinguish between three different practices that influence perceptions of 'good' case research in this scholarly domain: 'common' practice, 'best practice' and 'innovative' practice. Our contribution lies in problematising what 'good' case research is, and showing how research practice - not just methodological literature - has a role in generating methodological conventions in a disciplinary field. Crown

Organisation(s)
External organisation(s)
Aalto University, Hanken School of Economics, The University of Sydney, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Journal
Industrial Marketing Management
Volume
39
Pages
109-117
No. of pages
9
ISSN
0019-8501
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.04.017
Publication date
01-2010
Peer reviewed
Yes
Austrian Fields of Science 2012
502016 SME-research
Keywords
ASJC Scopus subject areas
Marketing
Portal url
https://ucris.univie.ac.at/portal/en/publications/good-case-research-in-industrial-marketing(5f9082ff-d719-41c5-8039-2ebd4001f1f1).html